MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1603043540 · doi:10.1017/s0027763000022145

Bergman norm estimates of Poisson integrals

2001· article· en· W1603043540 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueNagoya Mathematical Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Harmonic Analysis Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersKwangwoon University
KeywordsMathematicsPoisson distributionNorm (philosophy)Poisson kernelHarmonic functionUniqueness theorem for Poisson's equationUniform normPure mathematicsMathematical analysisBoundary value problemStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the half space R n × R+, it has been known that harmonic Bergman space b p can contain a positive function only if . Thus, for , Poisson integrals can be b p -functions only by means of their boundary cancellation properties. In this paper, we describe what those cancellation properties explicitly are. Also, given such cancellation properties, we obtain weighted norm inequalities for Poisson integrals. As a consequence, under weighted integrability condition given by our weighted norm inequalities, we show that our cancellation properties are equivalent to the b p -containment of Poisson integrals for p under consideration. Our results are sharp in the sense that orders of our weights cannot be improved.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.429
Teacher spread0.330 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it