MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Polar‐biased localization of the cold stress‐induced RNA helicase, CrhC, in the Cyanobacterium <i>Anabaena</i> sp. strain PCC 7120

2003· article· en· W1603052219 on OpenAlexafffund
Bassam El‐Fahmawi, George W. Owttrim

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Microbiology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPhotosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyCytoplasmCell fractionationRNARNA Helicase ACell membraneCell biologySubcellular localizationSpheroplastCellMembraneMolecular biologyBiochemistryHelicaseGeneEscherichia coli

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shift of the filamentous cyanobacterium, Anabaena sp. strain PCC 7120, from 30 degrees C to 20 degrees C induces expression of a cold shock response gene encoding the RNA helicase CrhC. Subcellular localization using cellular fractionation and membrane purification indicated that CrhC is localized to the plasma membrane with no evidence of a soluble-cytoplasmic form. Treatment of spheroplasts with trypsin and membrane fractions with various denaturing agents identified CrhC as an integral membrane protein associated with the cytoplasmic face of the plasma membrane. Immunoelectron microscopy confirmed the plasma membrane association of CrhC. Interestingly, a higher specific labelling was observed at the cell poles on the septa between adjacent cells within cell filaments. On a per cell area basis, CrhC localization to the cell pole was 3.5- and >1000-fold higher than to the lateral portion of the plasma membrane or cytoplasm respectively. In addition, CrhC also localizes to new cell poles forming within a dividing cell. Polar-biased localization of the CrhC RNA helicase implies a role in RNA metabolism that is plasma membrane associated and preferentially occurs at the cell poles during cyanobacterial response to cold stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.667

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular MicrobiologySame topicPhotosynthetic Processes and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207