MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1603209234 · doi:10.1063/1.1514207

Infrared spectra of N2O–hydrogen complexes

2002· article· en· W1603209234 on OpenAlexaff
Jian Tang, A. R. W. McKellar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Chemical Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamics
Canadian institutionsSteacie Institute for Molecular Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntermolecular forceInfrared spectroscopySpectral linevan der Waals forceHydrogenChemistryInfraredMoleculeAtomic physicsSpectroscopyHydrogen bondVan der Waals moleculePhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The infrared spectra of five distinct species of N2O–hydrogen van der Waals complexes (N2O–paraH2, –orthoH2, –orthoD2, –paraD2, and –HD) were studied in the region of the ν1 fundamental band of N2O (≈2224 cm−1) by tunable diode laser spectroscopy in a pulsed supersonic jet expansion. The spectra corresponded to those of T-shaped asymmetric rotors with mainly a-type transitions (ΔKa=0), plus weaker b-type transitions (ΔKa=±1) in the case of N2O–D2. They were analyzed using a conventional Hamiltonian with quadratic centrifugal distortion parameters. The fitted rotational parameters were consistent with structures having intermolecular separations between 3.25–3.4 Å and angles of about 80° between the N2O axis and the hydrogen center-of-mass. These intermolecular distances are about 0.3 Å shorter than those observed previously for the related system, OCS–hydrogen. The band origins were blueshifted relative to the free N2O molecule by from +0.25 to +0.79 cm−1. These vibrational shifts showed regularities among the different spin and isotopic forms of hydrogen that were analogous to those in OCS–hydrogen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.439

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Chemical PhysicsSame topicQuantum, superfluid, helium dynamicsFrench-language works237,207