MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1603298597 · doi:10.4000/books.pup.4190

Lancelot échevelé : la parodie dans Les Merveilles de Rigomer

2004· book-chapter· fr· W1603298597 on OpenAlexaff
Isabelle Arseneau

Bibliographic record

VenuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooks · 2004
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A partir de la fin du xiie siècle, le roman arthurien en vers est traversé par un courant parodique, centré principalement autour du personnage de Gauvain. En dérogeant aux conventions romanesques qui, comme l’art du portrait, régissaient jusque-là la production en vers, les auteurs de ces récits parodiques ont fait une entorse au genre établi. Ainsi, dans un roman daté du dernier tiers du xiiie siècle, Les Merveilles de Rigomer, les yeux du parodiste se tournent, pour la première fois, vers ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePresses universitaires de Provence eBooksSame topicMedieval European Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207