MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1603323139 · doi:10.1109/icdar.2003.1227854

New approach for the skeletonization of handwritten characters in gray-scale images

2005· article· en· W1603323139 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkeletonizationGrayscaleArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePixelComputer visionBinary imagePattern recognition (psychology)Point (geometry)Image processingProcess (computing)Gray levelImage (mathematics)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing skeletonization methods operate directly onthe binary image ignoring the gray-level information.In this paper we propose a new method for the skeletonization of handwritten characters that uses gray-level information and capitalizes on their elongatedpattern properties. The method controls the development of the skeleton while iteratively binarizing thegray-level image. Two types of iterations are performed: the iterative skeletonization and deletion ofboundary pixels, which is nested within the iterativebinarization of the gray-level image. Detailed analysis of the skeletonization process is presented to showits superior performance related to the prevention offlooding water and end point shrinkage and to noiseimmunity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.194

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDigital Image Processing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207