MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1603364109 · doi:10.1109/icc.2015.7248606

Robust MMSE design for full-duplex decode-and-forward SC-FDE relay systems

2015· article· en· W1603364109 on OpenAlexaff
Peiran Wu, Robert Schober, Vijay K. Bhargava

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSC-FDEPrecodingComputer scienceRelayTransmitter power outputConvex optimizationEqualization (audio)Optimization problemMinimum mean square errorTransmission (telecommunications)Mathematical optimizationAlgorithmMathematicsPower (physics)TelecommunicationsDecoding methodsRegular polygonMIMOChannel (broadcasting)Transmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the robust transceiver design for a two-hop full-duplex decode-and-forward relay system employing single-carrier transmission with frequency-domain equalization (SC-FDE). The design problem for the transmit precoding and receive equalization is formulated as an optimization problem with the objective to minimize the sum mean-squared error (MSE) of the two hops subject to separate node transmit power constraints. We show that the equalization filters can be optimized individually at the receiving nodes and take the form of robust Wiener filters. However, due to the loopback interference, the transmissions in the two hops are coupled and the transmit precoding problem boils down to a non-convex power allocation problem in the frequency domain. An alternating optimization approach is proposed to obtain the power allocation where convex programming problems and difference of convex programming problems are solved in an alternating manner. Numerical results are provided to validate the MSE and the achievable rate of the proposed robust schemes, showing that significant performance gains can be achieved compared to conventional half-duplex systems and non-robust full-duplex designs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.681
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207