MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1603442075

栽培稻(Oryza sativa L.)亚种间F1花粉不育基因S-a的精细定位及克隆

2003· article· ja· W1603442075 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
苏菁, 刘耀光

Bibliographic record

Venue分子植物育种 · 2003
Typearticle
Languageja
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOryza sativaBiologyGenetics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

水稻籼粳亚种间存在着强大的杂种优势 ,但杂种育性普遍偏低成为这一杂种优势利用的主要障碍。研究证明 ,花粉不育是导致杂种不育的主要原因之一。张桂权和卢永根等 (1987- 1994 )鉴定了 6个花粉不育基因座位 (S a ,S b ,S c ,S d ,S e和S f)。其中S a基因座位已被庄楚雄等 (1996 )初步定位在水稻第一染色体着丝粒附近。本论文是在此基础上 ,利用美国Cornell大学、日本RGP构建的水稻高密度遗传图和日本构建的BAC/PAC物理图及其基因组测序资料 ,对S a作进一步的精细定位 ,建立了包含该基因的TAC重叠群 ,并通过序列分析发现S a候选基因 ,为分离鉴定S a基因及研究该基因在水稻杂种不育中的分子作用机理打下了基础。本研究主要结果如下 :1 构建了台中 6 5 (含S aj)及其近等基因系TILS4 (E4 ,含S ai)杂交的F2 群体 ,观察了 70 6株F2 个体的花粉育性分离状况。其中可育株 36 7株 ,半不育株 339株 ,分离比为 1∶1。2 利用前人筛选的多态性标记R2 15 9、R192 8和本研究新获得的多态性标记GR2、GR1、AR1、D2 3M、D1 5S、F12M 1,用 70 6株F2 群体对S a进行了的精细定位。结果表明S a与分子标记R2 15 9、GR2、GR1、AR1、R192 8、F12M 1、D1 5S和D2 3M之间的遗传距离分别为 2 0 7cM ,1 2 1cM ,0 6 5cM ,0 4 2cM

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.614
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue分子植物育种Same topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207