Sex Differences in the Rapid Control of Aromatase Activity in the Quail Preoptic Area
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adult male quail show high levels of aromatase activity in the preoptic area-hypothalamus (POA-HYP), which parallels the high number of aromatase-immunoreactive cells and elevated mRNA concentrations detected in this brain region by in situ hybridisation. Interestingly, females display considerably lower aromatase activity than males but have almost equal numbers of aromatase-immunoreactive cells and express similar levels of aromatase mRNA. Aromatase activity in the male POA-HYP can be rapidly regulated by calcium-dependent phosphorylations, in the absence of changes in enzyme concentration. In the present study, we investigated whether aromatase activity is differentially regulated by phosphorylations in males and females. A linear increase in accumulation of aromatisation products was observed in both sexes as a function of time but the rate of conversion was slower in females. Saturation analysis confirmed the lower maximum velocities (V(max) ) in females but indicated a similar affinity (K(m) ) in both sexes. Aromatase activity in females reacted differentially to manipulations of intracellular calcium. In particular, chelating calcium with ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA) resulted in a larger increase of enzymatic activity in males than in females, especially in the presence of ATP. A differential reaction to kinase inhibitors was also observed between males and females (i.e. a larger increase in aromatase activity in females than in males after exposure to specific inhibitors). These findings suggest that the nature of aromatase is conserved between the sexes, although the control of its activity by calcium appears to be different. Additional characterizations of intracellular calcium in both sexes would therefore be appropriate to better understand aromatase regulation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".