MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

“ON NOUS A PRIVÉS DU BRÉSIL…” LETTRE OUVERTE DEPUIS UNE AMÉRIQUE INÉDITE INCONNUE APPELÉE CANADA.

2012· article· fr· W1603589097 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean Morisset

Bibliographic record

VenueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceCartographyArtGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sob os Estados-Unidos da América e o Canadá atual - que antecedeu todos os documentos jurídicos que estabelecem seu fundamento colonial em Londres, em 1867, pelo Ato da América do Norte britânica - existe um outro Canadá escondido e oculto por todos, inclusive por ele mesmo. De uma superfície comparada à do Brasil contemporâneo e conhecido pelos europeus com a denominação de Nova França, este Canadá é imenso e suas fronteiras não definidas se estendem mais além da bacia Missouri-Mississipi para encontrar o México assim como o Grande Oregon - hoje desaparecido - para, em seguida, chegar virtualmente ao Caribe através do país da Luisiana. Um tal Canadá é e permanece parte integrante da América crioula e nativa, encarnando, dessa forma, uma identidade mais ligada ao Brasil e à América Latina do que aos Estados Unidos e à América britânica que se apropriou de seu nome e de suas mitologias para transformá-los em uma terra fantasma para um povo fantasma, e enterrar essa América canadense e este povo canadien sob os escombros da Manifest Destiny...Abstract: Hidden beneath the United States of America and present-day Canada – prior to all legal documents used, under the British North American Act of 1867, to establish its colonial founding in London, there is another Canada concealed by everyone… including itself. Known to Europeans as New France and comparable in extent to Brazil, although her borders were never defined, this other Canada is immense. It covers an area reaching as far as Mexico and Greater Oregon – that has since disappeared – to extend beyond the Missouri-Mississippi watershed and virtually down to the Caribbean through the “Pays de la Louisiane”. Such a Canada is an integral part of Creole and Native America. As such, it is more akin to Brazil and Latin America than to the USA and to a British America that has appropriated its name and symbols through a fabricated memory, thereby rendering it 20 Jean Morisset a ghost land for a ghost people. A Canadian America stemming from a Canadien People buried under the rubbles of the Manifest Destiny…Keywords: Memory; identity; America; Canada; BrazilRésumé: Sous les États-Unis d’Amérique et le Canada actuel – en amont de tous les documents juridiques qui en ont établi le fondement colonial à Londres, en 1867, par l’Acte de l’Amérique du Nord britannique – il existe un autre Canada caché et occulté par tous, y compris par lui-même. D’une superficie comparable au Brésil contemporain et connu pas les Européens sous l’appellation de Nouvelle-France, ce Canada est immense et ses frontières non démarquées s’étendent au-delà du Mississipi-Missouri pour rejoindre le Mexique aussi bien que le Grand Oregon – aujourd’hui disparu – pour ensuite s’étendre virtuellement jusqu’à la Caraïbe à travers le Pays de la Louisiane. Un tel Canada est et demeure partie intégrale de l’Amérique créole et première, incarnant à ce titre une identité plus reliée au Brésil et à la Latino-Amérique qu’aux États-Unis et à la British America qui s’est appropriée son nom et ses mythologies pour en faire une terre fantôme pour un peuple fantôme. Et disposer ainsi d’une Amérique canadienne et d’un peuple canadien sous les décombres de la Manifest Destiny…Mots-Clés: Mémoire; identité; Amériques; Canada; Brésil

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.400
Threshold uncertainty score0.804

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.013
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207