MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1603639300 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2001.933604

A robust model parameter extraction technique based on meta-evolutionary programming for high speed/high frequency package interconnects

2002· article· en· W1603639300 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Computer scienceCoplanar waveguideParametric statisticsElectronic engineeringFlip chipStriplineEvolutionary algorithmTerahertz radiationConvergence (economics)AlgorithmEngineeringOptoelectronicsMathematicsMaterials scienceTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A high efficiency version of the evolutionary algorithm called meta-evolutionary programming (meta-EP) is proposed for extraction of the circuit model parameters of the basic structures in the complex high speed/high frequency package interconnects such as flip chip interconnects. The algorithm is integrated with a diversity enhancement method called niching in order to decrease the chance of premature convergence. The method is applied to model parameter extraction of some flip chip interconnects such as coplanar waveguide (CPW) and stripline transitions in multi-layered structures. The results of this parametric modeling in all cases show excellent success with high accuracy in a wide range of frequency up to 50 GHz. Comparison with results, achieved from other techniques in these cases, proves the robustness of the proposed method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it