MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1603758951 · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2008.12.010

Deleterious Variants of FIG4, a Phosphoinositide Phosphatase, in Patients with ALS

2009· book-chapter· nl· W1603758951 on OpenAlexaff
Clement Y. Chow, John E. Landers, Sarah K. Bergren, Peter C. Sapp, Adrienne E. Grant, Julie Miller Jones, Lesley Everett, Guy M. Lenk, Diane McKenna‐Yasek, Lois S. Weisman, Denise A. Figlewicz, Robert H. Brown, Miriam H. Meisler

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Human Genetics · 2009
Typebook-chapter
Languagenl
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHereditary Neurological Disorders
Canadian institutionsAlzheimer Society of Canada
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeNational Institute of General Medical SciencesALS AssociationALS Therapy AllianceNational Institutes of HealthHoward Hughes Medical Institute
KeywordsAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisBiologyNonsynonymous substitutionGeneBiochemistryGeneticsDiseaseMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mutations of the lipid phosphatase FIG4 that regulates PI(3,5)P(2) are responsible for the recessive peripheral-nerve disorder CMT4J. We now describe nonsynonymous variants of FIG4 in 2% (9/473) of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and primary lateral sclerosis (PLS). Heterozygosity for a deleterious allele of FIG4 appears to be a risk factor for ALS and PLS, extending the list of known ALS genes and increasing the clinical spectrum of FIG4-related diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.068

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Human GeneticsSame topicHereditary Neurological DisordersFrench-language works237,207