Bibliographic record
Abstract
primary research S3 lowed by 21% O 2 -79% N 2 for 5 min, either on 6 consecutive days (recurrent episodic hypoxia), or on the 6th day only, following 5 daily normoxic exposures (single episodic hypoxia).Brains were collected either 5 min or 2 h after the last gaseous exposure.Brainstem sections underwent autoradiography with iodinated substance P for NK-1R or DAMGO for MOR.In nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) from brains collected 2 h after the last exposure, the binding densities of NK-1R and MOR were unaltered by a single episodic hypoxia, and were greatly increased after recurrent episodic hypoxia, indicating an upregulation of both receptors by the recurrent episodic stimulus.In the NTS from the brains collected 5 min after the last hypoxic exposure, there was an important discrepancy in the binding response between the NK-1R and the MOR: The NK-1R displayed a significant decrease in ligand binding after both single and recurrent episodic hypoxia, implying enhanced receptor internalization.In contrast, the binding of MOR was not changed, implying that the rate of receptor internalization was not altered by the hypoxic exposure.This difference would result in relatively greater availability of functional MOR to opioid peptides during hypoxia.At present, we are carrying out the same experiments in developing piglets, using the same hypoxia protocols.If the findings in piglets' brains (to be presented at the Satellite meeting) are the same as those in the adult rat brain, the greater availability of functional MOR as compared to NK-1R during hypoxia may explain the attenuated ventilatory response to repeated hypoxia during development in piglets.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".