MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1603924054 · doi:10.3138/flor.18.006

Chercher une fille, une épouse. Sexualités déviantes et parcours de rédemption

2001· article· fr· W1603924054 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Madeleine Jeay

Bibliographic record

VenueFlorilegium · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Literary Analyses
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La sexualite deviante et les parcours de redemption qui en decoulent constituent rarticulation narrative de trois textes qui proponent chacun une interpretation du meme scenario. Ii s'agit de La Manekine que Philippe de Remi a compose dans les annees 1230-1240, du Roman du comte d'Anjou de Jean Maillart termine en 1316, et de La Belle Helene de Constantinople datant du milieu du XIVe siecle. Tous trois ont ceci de commun qu'ils developpent un ensemble de motifs connus dans le repertoire des contes populaires, en particulier celui qui est intitule le "conte de la fille a la main coupee" dans l'index d'Aarne et Thompson. - Les quatre episodes du conte tels qu'Aarne et Thompson les determinent—mutilation de rheroine, mariage avec le roi, epouse calomniee et heureux dénouement—forment aussi l'ossature des trois oeuvres medievales. Sous ces quatre moments, il est facile cependant de saisir la structure binaire de tous ces ticks, les populaires et les autres, qui en epousent le parcours tres proppien de rupture et retablissement d'equilibre, une premiere restauration de rharmonie perdue n'intervenant que pour etre a nouveau menacee et permettre aux heros de parachever leur quete.3

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFlorilegiumSame topicHistorical and Literary AnalysesFrench-language works237,207