MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1604074048 · doi:10.5772/27650

Cellular and Molecular Characteristics of RSV-Induced Disease in Humans

2011· book-chapter· en· W1604074048 on OpenAlexaff
Olivier Touzelet, F. Ultan

Bibliographic record

VenueInTech eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRespiratory viral infections research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseaseVirologyComputational biologyBiologyMedicinePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection 98 obstruction), wheezing (bronchiolar involvement) and rales/ronchi (crepitations, alveolar involvement) (Freymuth et al, 2001;Rietveld, 2003).Thus, in a 13-year prospective study in infants and children in the United states, RSV was detected in 43%, 25%, 11% and 10% of paediatric hospitalisations for bronchiolitis, pneumonia, bronchitis and croup, respectively (Collins and Graham, 2008).RSV-LRTI can vary from mild to severe, the latter requiring admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) since the patients often need respiration support.Furthermore, Wang et al (1995) observed that among children hospitalised with RSV-LRTIs, 0.9% were associated with fatal cases.However, the mechanisms leading to either an URTI or a LRTI upon RSV infection are still not well understood and require further investigation.In order to facilitate a better understanding of severe RSV-induced diseases, this chapter will review the histopathology of RSV fatal cases, the cellular responses to infection and the factors associated with the severity of the illness in humans. Histopathology of fatal RSV casesSince its isolation in 1956 several reports have investigated the histopathology associated with fatal cases of RSV in children (

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.318
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInTech eBooksSame topicRespiratory viral infections researchFrench-language works237,207