MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1604121995 · doi:10.20381/ruor-11243

Petrogenesis of the Sudbury Igneous Complex: The shocking story.

2001· dissertation· en· W1604121995 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. M. Therriault

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrogenesisIgneous rockGeologyGeochemistryAstrobiologyPhysicsBasalt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Sudbury Structure, Ontario, is the remnant of a 1.85 Ga old impact crater, 200--250 km in diameter. Erosion and tectonism have affected the Sudbury Structure and resulted in considerable brittle and ductile deformation, and the removal of the surface expression of the crater structure and all exterior deposits typical of many terrestrial impact structures. However, substantial amounts of the interior deposits, including the craterfill products, have been preserved within the Sudbury Basin. Although most workers acknowledge an impact origin for the Sudbury Structure, the origin of the Sudbury Igneous Complex (SIC), located inside the Sudbury Structure, remains controversial. The objectives of this study are to elucidate the division of the SIC into lithologically separate phases and to understand their relation to impact and endogenic igneous processes by using physical, chemical and computer methods, and to model the genesis of the SIC. The SIC is a 2.5--3.0 km thick, ∼60 x 27 km elliptical igneous-rock body, consisting of four major lithologies (top to base): granophyre, quartz gabbro, norite, and the so-called contact sublayer. All these lithologies are continuous across the complex, except for the contact sublayer. Modal compositions reveal that the current nomenclature is improper. According to the IUGS classification, "quartz gabbro" samples should be classified as quartz monzogabbros and "norite" samples as quartz gabbros or quartz monzogabbros. In view of these observations, an updated terminology is proposed (top to base): upper unit, transition zone, middle unit, lower unit, and contact sublayer. Gradational mineralogical and geochemical variations between the SIC lithological units are evidence of a single melt system for the SIC. The occurrence of primary hydrous minerals, deuteric alteration, and abundant micrographic and granophyric intergrowths demonstrate that this melt was rich in H 2O. The intergrowths and other far-from-equilibrium textures are likely due to rapid crystallization as a result of a large undercooling caused by the exsolution of a volatile phase. The SIC differs from other known terrestrial impact melt sheets only by its great thickness and its chemical layering. It is concluded that the SIC is a differentiated impact melt sheet, the only one identified on Earth to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.883

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)→Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→