MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1604375741 · doi:10.4000/leportique.2486

Les milieux de l’imagination

2010· article· fr· W1604375741 on OpenAlexaff
Arnaud François

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Portique · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsMaRS
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepictionSubject (documents)WrightRepresentation (politics)Movie theaterPoetryAestheticsImaginationFocus (optics)PaintingArtSociologyArt historySociological imaginationEpistemologyPhilosophyVisual artsLiteratureComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How does a subject interact with a milieu? Whereas the notions of mind and body are often called upon to answer the question, we choose to focus this time on imagination. Imagination is identified in Augustin Berque's onto-geography as a subject's access to reality. The question then becomes: how is this imagination mediated into poetic images or landscape paintings? The 20th century inventions of cinema and other technical modes of depiction play a capital role in the construction of this particular access to reality in which experience and representation intertwine. The thoughts of two major architects of the 20th century, Frank Lloyd Wright and Tadao Andô, can help illuminate the question regarding milieus and imagination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.040
Scholarly communication0.0190.015
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLe PortiqueSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207