MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1604375741 · doi:10.4000/leportique.2486

Les milieux de l’imagination

2010· article· fr· W1604375741 on OpenAlex
Arnaud François

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLe Portique · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsMaRS
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDepictionSubject (documents)WrightRepresentation (politics)Movie theaterPoetryAestheticsImaginationFocus (optics)PaintingArtSociologyArt historySociological imaginationEpistemologyPhilosophyVisual artsLiteratureComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

How does a subject interact with a milieu? Whereas the notions of mind and body are often called upon to answer the question, we choose to focus this time on imagination. Imagination is identified in Augustin Berque's onto-geography as a subject's access to reality. The question then becomes: how is this imagination mediated into poetic images or landscape paintings? The 20th century inventions of cinema and other technical modes of depiction play a capital role in the construction of this particular access to reality in which experience and representation intertwine. The thoughts of two major architects of the 20th century, Frank Lloyd Wright and Tadao Andô, can help illuminate the question regarding milieus and imagination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.915

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it