Le héros dans <em>La Bataille littéraire</em> après la Grande Guerre : une représentation au service d’une littérature nationale belge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article expose comment, au sortir de la Grande Guerre, la revue La Bataille littéraire a utilisé la notion de « héros » au service d’une certaine conception de la littérature belge. La problématique de la littérature nationale, extrêmement présente dans la littérature de langue française produite en Belgique, trouve dans les rapports entre littérature et guerre un nouveau lieu d’incarnation : le héros, tel qu’il est conçu par la revue, devient ainsi le héraut d’une conception nationaliste et unitaire de la littérature belge.AbstractThis article reveals how, at the end of the Great War, the review La Bataille littéraire used the concept of the "hero" to advance a certain conception of the Belgian literature. The national literature’s problems, extremely visible in the French language literature produced in Belgium, find in the relationship between literature and war a new place of incarnation: the hero, as envisioned by the review, thus becomes the herald of a nationalist and unified conception of the Belgian literature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".