MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1604404719 · doi:10.32316/hse/rhe.v27i1.4413

Creating Citizens, Building Societies? Adult Education in the Eastern Arctic as if Community Mattered

2015· article· fr· W1604404719 on OpenAlex
Sheena Kennedy Dalseg

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueHistorical Studies in Education / Revue d histoire de l éducation · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesEthnologySociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RésuméL’éducation aux adultes, au sens large, a été introduite comme faisant partie d’un vaste projet d’une intervention gouvernementale dans le nord du Canada qui a modifié dramatiquement les contextes sociaux, culturels et économiques des peuples aborigènes de cette région considérée comme leur patrie. Grâce à des initiatives variées en éducation des adultes – à la fois formelles et informelles – les Inuits ont commencé à interagir avec des idées nouvelles et de nouvelles institutions inhérentes à l’expansion territoriale du Nord. En se basant sur le lien entre éducation des adultes et transformation sociale et les concepts d’une éducation aux adultes « libérale » et « libératrice », cet article retrace l’évolution de la politique de l’éducation aux adultes et des programmes dans les Territoires du Nord-Ouest et du Nunavut entre le milieu des années 1960 et le milieu des années 1990. Cette recherche répond à trois questions. 1) Jusqu’à quel point l’éducation aux adultes donna ou enleva du pouvoir aux communautés à l’égard du développement social, politique et économique durant cette période. 2) En dépit de ses origines coloniales, comment l’éducation aux adultes a-t-elle fait la promotion de l’engagement citoyen et de la participation communautaire? 3) Au fil du temps, les changements apportés à l’éducation aux adultes reflètent-ils des tendances plus largement orientées vers une approche néolibérale du développement nordique, et qu’est-ce que cela implique pour le développement démocratique de ces communautés à l’avenir? AbstractAdult education, broadly defined, was introduced as part of a larger project of state-led intervention in northern Canada, which altered dramatically the social, cultural, and economic circumstances of the Indigenous peoples who called the region home. Through various adult education initiatives – both formal and informal – Inuit adults began to interact with new ideas and new institutions in the growing settlements across the North. Predicated on the link between adult education and social transformation, and the concepts of “liberal” and “liberating” adult education, this paper traces the evolution of adult education policy and programming in the Northwest Territories and Nunavut between the mid-1960s and the mid-1990s. It is guided by the following questions: (1) To what extent has adult education empowered or disempowered communities with respect to social, political, and economic development over time; (2) despite its colonial origins, to what extent has adult education promoted citizen engagement and participation; and (3) do the changes in adult education over time reflect broader trends towards a neo-liberal approach to northern development, and what might this mean for democratic development in communities in the future?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.484
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0080.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it