MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1604624074 · doi:10.3233/rnn-120300

Changes in thresholds for intracortical excitability in chronic stroke: More than just altered intracortical inhibition

2013· article· en· W1604624074 on OpenAlexafffund
Jodi D. Edwards, Sean K. Meehan, Meghan A. Linsdell, Michael R. Borich, Keivan Anbarani, Paul W. Jones, Jennifer K. Ferris, Lara A. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueRestorative Neurology and Neuroscience · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTranscranial magnetic stimulationStroke (engine)PsychologyStimulus (psychology)Chronic strokeAudiologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAnalysis of varianceNeuroscienceMedicineRehabilitationStimulationInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to assess changes in thresholds for the onset of short intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) in individuals with chronic stroke compared to age-matched healthy adults and evaluate the relationship between these thresholds and motor function in the chronic stroke group. METHODS: Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation was used to derive thresholds for the onset of SICI and ICF in 12 neurologically healthy and 12 individuals with chronic stroke. Motor evoked potentials were elicited by a test stimulus of fixed intensity preceded by a conditioning stimulus ranging from 0%-125% of active motor threshold to generate recruitment curves. Regression functions were fit to these recruitment curves to identify thresholds for the onset of SICI and ICF. Mixed measures analysis of variance was used to compare thresholds for each hemisphere within and between groups. RESULTS: Results showed a significant three-way interaction between Group (stroke, healthy), Hemisphere (ipsilesional, contralesional) and Stimulus interval (2 ms, 12 ms). Significant differences in the thresholds for the onset of both SICI and ICF were present in individuals with chronic stroke, with no between hemisphere differences for the control group. When compared to age-matched controls, comparisons revealed significant reductions in ipsilesional, but not contralesional thresholds for the onset of ICF, and significant reductions in contralesional, but not ipsilesional, thresholds for the onset of SICI in individuals with chronic stroke. In addition, as thresholds for ICF and SICI in stroke patients approached the level of healthy adults, higher function on the Wolf Motor Function Test was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced thresholds for the onset of SICI and ICF observed in the present study indicate that both inhibitory and facilitatory systems mediate changes in cortical excitability in chronic stroke patients. The association between higher onset thresholds and motor function in the stroke group also suggests that these thresholds have potential utility for tracking functional motor improvements in patients with chronic stroke. This study provides new insights to further characterize changes in intracortical neurotransmission that play an important role in modulating neuroplasticity and the potential relationship between inhibitory and facilitatory networks and motor function post-stroke.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRestorative Neurology and NeuroscienceSame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207