MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1604699793 · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2012.248948

Role of microprojections in myoendothelial feedback – a theoretical study

2013· article· en· W1604699793 on OpenAlexafffund
Sridevi Nagaraja, Adam Kapela, Cam Ha T. Tran, Donald G. Welsh, Nikolaos M. Tsoukias

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsLibin Cardiovascular Institute of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsStimulationBiophysicsReceptorCalciumChemistryVascular smooth muscleContraction (grammar)Cell biologyNeuroscienceSmooth muscleBiologyBiochemistryEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key points Endothelial microprojections (MPs) are cellular extensions of endothelial cells (ECs) that may be involved in regulation of smooth muscle cell (SMC) constriction in blood vessels. We developed computational models to investigate the role of MPs in generating EC feedback during SMC stimulation. The models account for the geometry of MPs and heterogeneous distribution of membrane channels and receptors in an EC. Simulations show that SMC stimulation causes calcium release in and around EC MPs that activates hyperpolarizing currents in ECs and moderates SMC constriction. The results help us better understand the mechanisms that regulate blood flow and pressure. Abstract We investigated the role of myoendothelial projections (MPs) in endothelial cell (EC) feedback response to smooth muscle cell (SMC) stimulation using mathematical modelling. A previously developed compartmental EC–SMC model is modified to include MPs as subcellular compartments in the EC. The model is further extended into a 2D continuum model using a finite element method (FEM) approach and electron microscopy images to account for MP geometry. The EC and SMC are coupled via non‐selective myoendothelial gap junctions (MEGJs) which are located on MPs and allow exchange of Ca2+, K+, Na+ and Cl− ions and inositol 1,4,5‐triphosphate (IP3). Models take into consideration recent evidence for co‐localization of intermediate‐conductance calcium‐activated potassium channels (IKCa) and IP3 receptors (IP3Rs) in the MPs. SMC stimulation causes an IP3‐mediated Ca2+ transient in the MPs with limited global spread in the bulk EC. A hyperpolarizing feedback generated by the localized IKCa channels is transmitted to the SMC via MEGJs. MEGJ resistance (Rgj) and the density of IKCa and IP3R in the projection influence the extent of EC response to SMC stimulation. The predicted Ca2+ transients depend also on the volume and geometry of the MP. We conclude that in the myoendothelial feedback response to SMC stimulation, MPs are required to amplify the SMC initiated signal. Simulations suggest that the signal is mediated by IP3 rather than Ca2+ diffusion and that a localized rather than a global EC Ca2+ mobilization is more likely following SMC stimulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of PhysiologySame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207