MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W16047627

Land use interactions drive southwestern Ontario stream nutrient concentrations

2014· article· en· W16047627 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Renee L Lazor

Bibliographic record

VenueHospitals & health networks · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaU.S. Geological Survey
KeywordsNutrientEnvironmental scienceLand useHydrology (agriculture)GeologyEcologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human activities have transformed the landscape and altered natural habitats through intensive land uses including agriculture and urbanization. Identifying land use drivers of tributary nutrient concentrations and describing the magnitude and direction of their relationship are critical activities to improvement management of water quality in basins draining into the Great Lakes. The overarching goal of my thesis was to quantify the cumulative influence of spatial patterns in land use and land cover on variation of nutrient concentrations in tributaries of the Great Lakes. Biweekly water chemistry samples were collected in 29 streams located in southern Ontario between May and November, 2012. Agriculture, urbanization and the population served per km2 by a municipal sewage treatment plant were quantified for each stream at multiple spatial scales. Ordinary least squares regression analysis models identified relationships between nutrient parameters (NO3-+NO2-, NH3, TKN, TN, SRP, TDP, and TP) and land use descriptors. Significant associations were identified for all nutrient parameters with the exception of TDP. NO3-+NO2- was driven by a combination of urban and agriculture land use in the catchment. NH3, TKN, and SRP were related to agriculture and sewage treatment plants (STPs). TN and TP were only associated with STP population served per km2. Model predictive performance was evaluated under three scenarios; data comparability, spatial robustness and temporal robustness (dry, moderate and wet climate scenarios). Overall, assessment of model performance indicated that data sampling and collection protocol may limit prediction accuracy. My results show that human activities are significant drivers of stream nutrient concentrations and that nitrogen forms can be predicted, on average, in70% of evaluation streams under most scenarios. My findings demonstrate the utility of land use as a predictive tool for managing stream nutrient concentrations. The nitrogen models generated in my study could be used to enable planners and managers to better understand the potential implications of future land management decisions on water quality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.961

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHospitals & health networksSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207