MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1604843572 · doi:10.3138/flor.24.011

À chaque saint sa chandelle. Pour un calendrier ludique

2007· article· fr· W1604843572 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Giuseppe Di Stefano

Bibliographic record

VenueFlorilegium · 2007
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophyMiracleTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le hasard, qui fait bien les choses, veut que, pendant la rédaction de ces notes, la nouvelle de la béatification de Jean Paul II est sortie dans les média. On se souviendra que, lors de ses funérailles, les fidèles avaient affiché des santo subito bien visibles. Pour élever un élu au nombre des saints, l’Église a besoin de la preuve des miracles. Le fait est que les récentes nouvelles confirment qu’un miracle a eu lieu, en France. Une « pétite soeur », qui souffrait de la maladie de Parkinson s’est adressée par la prière à Jean Paul II; la guérison s’est produite. Or, Jean Paul II souffrait justement de la maladie de Parkinson.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.497
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFlorilegiumSame topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207