MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1604852140

The McGurk effect affected by the right ear advantage

2008· article· en· W1604852140 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Mark Scott

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDichotic listeningHeadphonesCLIPSAudiologySyllableLateralityPsychologyActive listeningSpeech recognitionAcousticsCommunicationComputer scienceMedicineArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The McGurk effect affected by the right ear advantage was investigated. The most common demonstration of the REA was the dichotic listening test. Subjects were simultaneously played two different syllables, one to each ear, and must report the syllable they perceive. WADA tests showed that about 90-95% of right-handers were left-hemisphere dominant for language but only 80-85% show an REA in dichotic studies. The McGurk effect was dependent on the audio component being ambiguous. Subjects viewed audiovisual clips on a continuous loop. The clips consisted of a voice pronouncing /aba/ dubbed over video of a face saying /aga/. The experiment was conducted in a quite room, with subjects wearing 'Extreme Isolation' [registered trademark] headphones. It was observed that REA is significant for right-handers as a group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicHemispheric Asymmetry in NeuroscienceFrench-language works237,207