Shear Stress and Hydrodynamic Recovery over Bedforms of Different Lengths in a Straight Channel
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pools and riffles are common morphological features in rivers that are frequently used but poorly specified analogs in restoration design. Here, straight two-dimensional (2D) bedforms are conceptualized as perturbations and flow recovery is measured in a laboratory flume with an array of ultrasonic Doppler velocity profilers (UDVPs). The objectives are to (1) assess the variation of skin friction, turbulent stresses, and total stress; (2) assess the role of topographical feedback on flow recovery; and (3) compare flow recovery in isolated and bedforms in series. The results show that the total shear stress and near-bed turbulence greatly exceed the skin friction in decelerating flow and the pool and that hydrodynamic recovery tends to occur at length scales similar to geophysical scales despite potential negative feedback from the bed. Repeating short bedforms can push the flow to a more turbulent and laterally concentrated equilibrium condition. Implications for sediment entrainment thresholds, existing models of riffle-pool hydrodynamics, and the stability of constructed riffle pools are discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it