Identité et rétention chez les anglophones de Québec : un changement générationnel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Depuis 1970, le déclin démographique du Québec anglais s’explique principalement par l’émigration hors Québec. Comment expliquer les migrations des Anglo-Québécois ? Les recherches antérieures se sont principalement penchées sur l’« exode » et sur les Anglo-Montréalais. Cet article vise plutôt à mieux comprendre ce qui retient les anglophones de la ville de Québec dans la province. L’analyse typologique de 18 entrevues qualitatives mène à la conclusion suivante : même si d’autres facteurs expliquent ce qui retient les anglophones de Québec, l’identité est au coeur de l’explication de leur rétention. Une étude générationnelle a permis d’observer les changements migratoires et identitaires s’opérant au sein de la communauté anglophone de Québec.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".