MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1605171964

Adapting heterogeneous ensembles with particle swarm optimization for video face recognition

2012· article· en· W1605171964 on OpenAlexaff
Éric Granger, Robert Sabourin, Jean-François Connolly

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceParticle swarm optimizationMachine learningFacial recognition systemBiometricsArtificial neural networkHyperparameterProcess (computing)Matching (statistics)Pattern recognition (psychology)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In video-based face recognition applications, matching is typically performed by comparing query samples against biometric models (i.e., an individual's facial model) that is designed with reference samples captured during an enrollment process. Although statistical and neural pattern classifiers may represent a flexible solution to this kind of problem, their performance depends heavily on the availability of representative reference data. With operators involved in the data acquisition process, collection and analysis of reference data is often expensive and time consuming. However, although a limited amount of data is initially available during enrollment, new reference data may be acquired and labeled by an operator over time. Still, due to a limited control over changing operational conditions and personal physiology, classification systems used for video-based face recognition are confronted to complex and changing pattern recognition environments. This thesis concerns adaptive multiclassifier systems (AMCSs) for incremental learning of new data during enrollment and update of biometric models. To avoid knowledge (facial models) corruption over time, the proposed AMCS uses a supervised incremental learning strategy based on dynamic particle swarm optimization (DPSO) to evolve a swarm of fuzzy ARTMAP (FAM) neural networks in response to new data. As each particle in a FAM hyperparameter search space corresponds to a FAM network, the learning strategy adapts learning dynamics by co-optimizing all their parameters—hyperparameters, weights, and architecture—in order to maximize accuracy, while minimizing computational cost and memory resources. To achieve this, the relationship between the classification and optimization environments is studied and characterized, leading to these additional contributions. An initial version of this DPSO-based incremental learning strategy was applied to an adaptive classification system (ACS), where the accuracy of a single FAM neural network is maximized. It is shown that the original definition of a classification system capable of supervised incremental learning must be reconsidered in two ways. Not only must a classifier's learning dynamics be adapted to maintain a high level of performance through time, but some previously acquired learning validation data must also be used during adaptation. It is empirically shown that adapting a FAM during incremental learning constitutes a type III dynamic optimization problem in the search space, where the local optima values and their corresponding position change in time. Results also illustrate the necessity of a long term memory (LTM) to store previously acquired data for unbiased validation and performance estimation. The DPSO-based incremental learning strategy was then modified to evolve the swarm (or pool) of FAM networks within an AMCS. A key element for the success of ensembles is tackled: classifier diversity. With several correlation and diversity indicators, it is shown that genotype (i.e., hyperparameters) diversity in the optimization environment is correlated with classifier diversity in the classification environment. Following this result, properties of a DPSO algorithm that seeks to maintain genotype particle diversity to detect and follow local optima are exploited to generate and evolve diversified pools of FAMclassifiers. Furthermore, a greedy search algorithm is presented to perform an efficient ensemble selection based on accuracy and genotype diversity. This search algorithm allows for diversified ensembles without evaluating costly classifier diversity indicators, and selected ensembles also yield accuracy comparable to that of reference ensemble-based and batch learning techniques, with only a fraction of the resources. Finally, after studying the relationship between the classification environment and the search space, the objective space of the optimization environment is also considered. An aggregated dynamical niching particle swarm optimization (ADNPSO) algorithm is presented to guide the FAM networks according two objectives: FAM accuracy and computational cost. Instead of purely solving a multi-objective optimization problem to provide a Pareto-optimal front, the ADNPSO algorithm aims to generate pools of classifiers among which both genotype and phenotype (i.e., objectives) diversity are maximized. ADNPSO thus uses information in the search spaces to guide particles towards different local Pareto-optimal fronts in the objective space. A specialized archive is then used to categorize solutions according to FAM network size and then capture locally non-dominated classifiers. These two components are then integrated to the AMCS through an ADNPSO-based incremental learning strategy. The AMCSs proposed in this thesis are promising since they create ensembles of classifiers designed with the ADNPSO-based incremental learning strategy and provide a high level of accuracy that is statistically comparable to that obtained through mono-objective optimization and reference batch learning techniques, and yet requires a fraction of the computational cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.275
Threshold uncertainty score0.425

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchFrench-language works237,207