MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1605315199 · doi:10.1002/9780470513347.ch8

Calcium Binding to Skeletal Muscle Troponin C and the Regulation of Muscle Contraction

2007· article· en· W1605315199 on OpenAlexaff
Osnat Herzberg, John Moult, Michael N.G. James

Bibliographic record

VenueNovartis Foundation symposium · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaMedical Council of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTroponin CBiophysicsChemistryCrystallographyHelix (gastropod)TroponinSkeletal muscleCalciumStereochemistryBiologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skeletal muscle contraction is initiated by Ca2+ ion binding to troponin C (TnC), a protein of the thin filament. Our three-dimensional structure determination of turkey skeletal TnC at 2.8 A resolution revealed an extended molecule consisting of two domains connected through a long nine-turn alpha-helix. The C-terminal domain has two Ca2+ ions bound in the expected manner of EF hands, whereas the N-terminal regulatory domain is Ca2+-free with a helix-loop-helix conformation different from that of an EF hand. The refinement of TnC at 2.2 A resolution highlights the intricate hydrogen-bonded network common to the Ca2+-bound loops and provides an explanation for the presence of a water molecule in the 5th coordination position of the Ca2+ ion. We propose that Ca2+ binding to the regulatory domain is accompanied by a conformational transition by which its structure becomes similar to that of the C-terminal domain. Dramatic movements of residues in the B and C helices and the connecting peptide of up to 14 A constitute the bulk of this change. A hydrophobic site that could be the site of interaction with troponin I is thereby exposed. We have also demonstrated that this model of the Ca2+-bound conformation can be reached from the Ca2+-free state without having to surmount large energy barriers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.892
Threshold uncertainty score0.331

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNovartis Foundation symposiumSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207