La base textuelle du <i>Dictionnaire électronique de Chrétien de Troyes</i>. Établissement et fonctionnalités
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Dictionnaire Électronique de Chrétien de Troyes (désormais DÉCT) constitue à la fois un lexique de cet écrivain du XIIe siècle et une base textuelle qui permet de lire ou d’interroger les transcriptions de ses cinq romans (Érec, Cligès, Lancelot ou le Chevalier à la Charrette, Yvain ou le Chevalier au Lion, Perceval ou le Conte du Graal). Le DÉCT résulte de la collaboration d’un groupe de chercheurs : Pierre Kunstmann, du LFA (Laboratoire de Français Ancien, Université d’Ottawa), qui en assume la direction et rédige les articles; Hiltrud Gerner, de l’ATILF (Analyse et Traitement Automatique de la Langue Française, CNRS Nancy-Université), chargée de la présentation et de la révision des articles ainsi que de la rédaction de certaines lettres; Gilles Souvay, de l’ATILF, pour les développements informatiques; A. Stein de l’Institut für Linguistik / Romanistik, Université de Stuttgart, pour l’analyse sémantique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.035 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".