MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1605408024

Functional forms and PPP: The case of canada, the EU, Japan, and the U.K

2009· article· en· W1605408024 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yu Hsing

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied econometrics and international development · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMonetary Policy and Economic Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPurchasing power parityRelative purchasing power parityEconomicsRelative standard deviationProportionality (law)EconometricsRelative priceRelative valueValue (mathematics)MathematicsStatisticsExchange rateMonetary economicsMacroeconomicsPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper applies an extended Box-Cox model to test the functional form of the purchasing power parity hypothesis for Canada, the EU, Japan, and the U.K. Both the relative CPI and the relative PPI are considered in empirical work. The log-log form commonly chosen by most researchers can be rejected for Japan when the relative PPI is considered and the EU and the U.K. when the relative CPI or PPI is considered. The value of R2 is higher based on the relative PPI than that based on the relative CPI. None of the estimated elasticities is statistically equal to unity, suggesting that proportionality may not apply.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.146 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied econometrics and international developmentSame topicMonetary Policy and Economic ImpactFrench-language works237,207