MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1605610575 · doi:10.1002/acs.703

On‐line almost‐sure parameter estimation for partially observed discrete‐time linear systems with known noise characteristics

2002· article· en· W1605610575 on OpenAlexaff
Robert J. Elliott, Jason Ford, J.B. Moore

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStability and Control of Uncertain Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstimatorMathematicsApplied mathematicsDiscrete time and continuous timeMartingale (probability theory)Estimation theoryLemma (botany)Convergence (economics)Noise (video)Parameter spaceOrdinary differential equationDifferential equationAlgorithmMathematical analysisComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this paper we discuss parameter estimators for fully and partially observed discrete‐time linear stochastic systems (in state‐space form) with known noise characteristics. We propose finite‐dimensional parameter estimators that are based on estimates of summed functions of the state, rather than of the states themselves. We limit our investigation to estimation of the state transition matrix and the observation matrix. We establish almost‐sure convergence results for our proposed parameter estimators using standard martingale convergence results, the Kronecker lemma and an ordinary differential equation approach. We also provide simulation studies which illustrate the performance of these estimators. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal ProcessingSame topicStability and Control of Uncertain SystemsFrench-language works237,207