MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Analysis of expressed sequence tags derived from pea leaves infected by <i>Peronospora viciae</i> f. sp. <i>pisi</i>

2012· article· en· W1605612886 on OpenAlex
Jie Feng, K. F. Chang, Sheau‐Fang Hwang, Stephen E. Strelkov, R. L. Conner, B. D. Gossen, Debra L. McLaren, Y.Y. Chen

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Applied Biology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogens and Resistance
Canadian institutionsBrandon UniversityUniversity of AlbertaAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaAgriculture Food and Rural Development
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDowny mildewBiologyGeneGeneticsSequence analysisBotanyExpressed sequence tagComplementary DNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A cDNA library was constructed from field pea leaves infected by the downy mildew pathogen, Peronospora viciae f. sp. pisi , using a suppression subtractive hybridisation approach. The library consists of 399 expressed sequence tags, from which 207 unisequences were obtained after sequence assembly. Of the unisequences, six were shown to be of Peronospora viciae f. sp. pisi origin. The remaining unisequences were subjected to gene ontology analysis and their functions were predicted in silico . Eleven of these unisequences (representing 24 clones) shared significant sequence similarities with Arabidopsis genes known to be involved in downy mildew resistance, including the well‐characterised genes RPP5 , RPP6 and RPP27 . Expression analysis of five selected unisequences by real‐time PCR indicated that all five were up‐regulated during downy mildew pathogenesis, suggesting a significant role for these genes in the host response to downy mildew infection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.334

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it