Les pratiques d’affiliation dans les Auberges du cœur au Québec : partir de soi pour s’inscrire dans le monde
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents an innovative social practice aimed at teenagers and young adults who are experiencing difficulties in integrating mainstream society. Every year, the Auberges du Coeur du Québec network, which regroups 29 different homes and shelters distributed in 11 of Quebec’s administrative regions, welcomes 2500 homeless teenagers and young adults between the ages of 12 and 30. Opened 24 hours each day, every day of the week, they offer, besides food and shelter, a support for those who chose voluntarily to take the necessary steps to improve their situation. Based on the idea of social affiliation, this practice is sharply different from those currently implemented in the institutions that are part of the State social services network. The objective of this study was to develop a better understanding on the nature and specificity of this practice. Using a qualitative methodology, five different shelters that are part of the Auberges du Coeur network were thoroughly investigated. This article begins with a clarification of the various forms of exclusion experienced by a number of young Quebecers. These difficulties are explored through their relationships with their families, the school or the labour market. Then, looking at the social practices, different factors that promote or impede social affiliation and reinforce autonomy are examined ; namely: relationship to oneself, relationship to others, to the community and to the world.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it