MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1605956570 · doi:10.7202/001203ar

L’aliment, un futur miracle de la biotechnologie?

2002· article· fr· W1605956570 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lise Dubois

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologie et sociétés · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'aliment entre dans une ère nouvelle de transformations biotechnologiques qui lui permettra de devenir un moyen d'intervention sur le corps au niveau génétique, ce qui soulève des questions d'ordre éthique. La science établit tics liens de plus en plus nombreux entre l'alimentation et la santé qui permettent à l'agro-alimentaire de développer des produits d'un nouveau genre : l'aliment fonctionnel, qui se situe entre l'aliment et le médicament. Ultimement, il sera possible d'offrir au consommateur les aliments correspondants à ses besoins spécifiques. Mais d'ici là, il faut s'interroger sur l'innocuité des produits et leur efficacité réelle. Ces produits santé qui constituent un marché à venir important pour l'agro-alimentaire sont de plus en plus difficiles à réglementer, et on doit s'assurer qu'ils ne contribueront pas à accroître les inégalités.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.016
Scholarly communication0.0120.016
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0060.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologie et sociétésSame topicNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207