MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1605956570 · doi:10.7202/001203ar

L’aliment, un futur miracle de la biotechnologie?

2002· article· fr· W1605956570 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lise Dubois

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologie et sociétés · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicNutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'aliment entre dans une ère nouvelle de transformations biotechnologiques qui lui permettra de devenir un moyen d'intervention sur le corps au niveau génétique, ce qui soulève des questions d'ordre éthique. La science établit tics liens de plus en plus nombreux entre l'alimentation et la santé qui permettent à l'agro-alimentaire de développer des produits d'un nouveau genre : l'aliment fonctionnel, qui se situe entre l'aliment et le médicament. Ultimement, il sera possible d'offrir au consommateur les aliments correspondants à ses besoins spécifiques. Mais d'ici là, il faut s'interroger sur l'innocuité des produits et leur efficacité réelle. Ces produits santé qui constituent un marché à venir important pour l'agro-alimentaire sont de plus en plus difficiles à réglementer, et on doit s'assurer qu'ils ne contribueront pas à accroître les inégalités.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.257
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.128
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologie et sociétésSame topicNutrition, Genetics, and DiseaseFrench-language works237,207