A Central Role for Oxygen‐Sensitive K <sup>+</sup> Channels and Mitochondria in the Specialized Oxygen‐Sensing System
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mammals possess a specialized O2-sensing system (SOS), which compensates for encounters with hypoxia that occur during development, disease, and at altitude. Consisting of the resistance pulmonary arteries (PA), ductus arteriosus, carotid body, neuroepithelial body, systemic arteries, fetal adrenomedullary cell and fetoplacental arteries, the SOS optimizes O2-uptake and delivery. Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV), a vasomotor response of resistance PAs to alveolar hypoxia, optimizes ventilation/perfusion matching and systemic pO2. Though modulated by the endothelium, HPV's core mechanism resides in the smooth muscle cell (SMC). The Redox Theory proposes that HPV results from the coordinated action of a redox sensor (proximal mitochondrial electron transport chain) which generates a diffusible mediator (a reactive O2 species, ROS) that regulates effector proteins (voltage-gated K(v) channels). Hypoxic withdrawal of ROS inhibits K(v)1.5 and K(v)2.1, depolarizes PASMCs, activates voltage-gated Ca2+ channels, increasing Ca2+ influx and causing vasoconstriction. Hypoxia's effect on ROS (decrease vs. increase) and the molecular origins of ROS (mitochondria vs. NADPH oxidase) remains controversial. Distal to this pathway, Rho kinase regulates the contractile apparatus' sensitivity to Ca2+. Also, a role for cADP ribose as a redox-regulated mediator of intracellular Ca2+ release has been proposed. Despite tissue heterogeneity in the SOS's output (vasomotion versus neurosecretion), O2-sensitive K+ channels constitute a conserved effector mechanism. Disorders of the O2-sensing may contribute to diseases, such as pulmonary hypertension.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".