MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1606017774 · doi:10.1002/9781118630013.ch9

Cloud Computing–Enabled Cluster Detection Using a Flexibly Shaped Scan Statistic for Real‐Time Syndromic Surveillance

2014· other· en· W1606017774 on OpenAlex
Paul Bélanger, Kieran Moore

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley series in probability and statistics · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicData-Driven Disease Surveillance
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScan statisticCloud computingLeverage (statistics)Computer scienceStatisticCluster (spacecraft)Spatial analysisData miningData scienceArtificial intelligenceGeographyStatisticsRemote sensingMathematicsOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatial scan statistics are commonly used for detecting clusters of disease and other public health threats. Two challenges identified in spatial scan statistics include their typical reliance on circular scanning windows and the often onerous computational resources required to detect both circular and arbitrarily shaped spatial clusters. We leverage recent advances in cloud-computing technologies and platforms to test for emergent spatial clusters of sexually transmitted infections across Ontario, Canada. Cloud computing facilitates our ability to detect flexibly shaped clusters of disease and to do so cost-effectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.698
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it