Bibliographic record
Abstract
CANADIAN WOMAN STUDIES/LES CAHIERS DE LA FEMME Au courant de l’annee 1981, d’abord par le biais de l’alliance des groupes de la base comme le comite ad hoc des Femmes canadiennes pour la Constitution qui a surgi pour organiser la conference constitutionnelle quand Doris a demissionne,-des milliers de femmes du Canada se sont mobilisees pour reagir et plus de 1 000 femmes se sont rendues sur la colline parlementaire pour demander des garanties plus sures pour l’egalite des droits dans le brouillon de la Constitution. Quelques jeunes avocates, comme l’auteure, ont accepte d’envahir la colline alors qu’une foule de femmes en colere s’etaient ralliees aux membres du conseil consultatif nomme par le gouvernement. Elles ont confronte les politiciens sur leur terrain, jusque sur les marches de leurs edifices legislatifs, exigeant une place dans l’histoire de la Constitution canadienne qui faisait la une a l’epoque. Durant cet episode, Doris a ete une presence dirigeante et forte.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.029 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".