MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contribuição ao movimento de mudança na formação profissional em saúde: uma avaliação das experiências UNI

2002· article· pt· W1606226880 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInterface - Comunicação Saúde Educação · 2002
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth, Nursing, Elderly Care
Canadian institutionsKellogg's (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)Perspective (graphical)Context (archaeology)Class (philosophy)Work (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O artigo analisa estratégias de mudança e resultados parciais das experiências de mudança da formação de profissionais de saúde desencadeadas a partir dos projetos UNI na América Latina. Destaca-se a articulação orgânica entre universidade, serviços de saúde e organizações comunitárias como estratégia fundamental para orientar os processos de mudança na direção da relevância social. Características essenciais das propostas inovadoras de formação: currículos integrados, organizados em módulos temáticos baseados em problemas relevantes da realidade; metodologias ativas de ensino-aprendizagem que tomam estudantes como sujeitos; prática nos cenários dos serviços e da comunidade desde o início da carreira; avaliação formativa e somativa ao longo de todo o processo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0040.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.436
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it