MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1606359510

CoLoR : a Coq library on rewriting and termination

2006· article· en· W1606359510 on OpenAlexaff
Frédéric Blanqui, Solange Coupet-Grimal, William Delobel, Sébastien Hinderer, Adam Koprowski

Bibliographic record

VenueTU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicLogic, programming, and type systems
Canadian institutionsPrevention of Organ Failure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRewritingProgramming languageComputer scienceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Coq is a tool allowing to certify proofs. This paper describes a Coq library for certifying termination proofs. Termination is an important and difficult problem. Many criteria have been developed over the last years. They are more and more complex and applied on larger and larger systems. For these tools to be used in the certification of critical systems and proof assistants, their results must be certified.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.049
Threshold uncertainty score0.163

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0490.028

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTU/e Research Portal (Eindhoven University of Technology)Same topicLogic, programming, and type systemsFrench-language works237,207