MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cul1 expression is increased in early stages of human melanoma

2010· letter· en· W1606418243 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Guangdi Chen, Yabin Cheng, Magdalena Martinka, Gang Li

Bibliographic record

VenuePigment Cell & Melanoma Research · 2010
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicUbiquitin and proteasome pathways
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal Health Research InstituteUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver Coastal Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCancer researchUbiquitinSkp1Ubiquitin ligaseSKP2MelanomaCancerMedicineCyclin D1Cyclin EBiologyMetastasisCell cycleOncologyInternal medicineGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dear Editor, Human cutaneous malignant melanoma is the most serious type of skin cancer, which is derived from epidermal melanocytes. Epidemiological studies estimate a doubling of melanoma incidence every 10–20 yrs (Garbe et al., 2000). Although early diagnosed melanomas are curable with surgical excision, up to 20% of patients will develop metastatic tumors because of its high capability of invasion and rapid metastasis to other organs (Balch et al., 2001). Despite many advances in cancer treatment over the last several decades, the prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma remains poor. The 5-yr survival rate for patients with distant metastases is <10% (Trinh, 2008). The ubiquitin–proteasome system controls the abundance of a number of cellular proteins and plays a crucial role in maintaining and regulating cellular homeostasis (Paul, 2008). Dysfunction of E3 ubiquitin ligases that target substrates for polyubiquitination and degradation, contributes abnormal cell growth and differentiation (Reinstein and Ciechanover, 2006). Cullin1 (Cul1) serves as a rigid scaffold in SCF (Skp1/Cullin/Rbx1/F-box protein) complex, the largest family of ubiquitin-protein E3 ligases, and aberrant expression of Cul1 is involved in dysfunction of SCF E3 ligases (Zheng et al., 2002). It has been reported that the loss of Cul1 results in early embryonic lethality and deregulation of cyclin E (Dealy et al., 1999). In addition, c-Myc activates Cul1 gene expression and promotes ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis (O’hagan et al., 2000). However, little is known about the expression of Cul1 in cancers. In this study, we first compared Cul1 protein level in nine melanoma cell lines with that in normal human melanocytes. Eight melanoma cell lines (MMAN, MEWO, MMRU, PMWK, RPEP, RPM-MC, Sk-mel-2 and Sk-mel-3) had higher Cul1 expression in comparison with normal human melanocytes, whereas only one cell line MMLH showed similar Cul1 level to melanocytes (Figure 1A and B). We next investigated Cul1 staining in 43 cases of dysplastic nevi, 89 primary and 47 metastatic melanomas using tissue microarray technology and immunohistochemistry and analyzed the correlation between Cul1 expression and clinicopathologic variables and patient survival. For the 89 primary melanoma cases, there were 54 men and 35 women, with age ranging from 21 to 93 (median = 57). For primary melanoma staging, we used Breslow thickness as our criteria for evaluating Cul1 expression, 58 tumors ≤2.0 mm and 31 >2.0 mm. Seventy-two melanomas were located in sun-exposed sites (head and neck), and 17 were located in sun-protected sites (other locations). Ulceration was observed in 18 cases (Table 1). Cul1 expression is increased in human melanoma cells. (A) Whole cell extracts were obtained from normal human melanocytes and melanoma cell lines for western blot analysis. (B) Cul1 protein expression level was determined by densitometric analysis of Cul1 bands in (A), and the dashed line indicated the average level of Cul1 in melanoma cells. As shown in Figure 2, various levels of cytoplasmic and nuclear Cul1 staining were observed in nevi and melanoma biopsies (Figure 2A–D). Among the groups, there are differences in the pattern of Cul1 expression, with increased levels of expression from dysplastic nevi to melanoma. Significant differences for Cu1 staining were observed between dysplastic nevi and primary melanoma (P < 0.01, χ2 test), or metastatic melanoma (P < 0.01, χ2 test). However, there was no significant difference for Cul1 staining between primary and metastatic melanoma (P = 0.76, χ2 test) (Figure 2E). Cul1 expression is increased in human melanomas. Representative images of Cul1 immunohistochemical staining in human melanocytic lesions. (A) Negative Cul1 staining, (B) Weak Cul1 staining, (C) Moderate Cul1 staining, (D) Strong Cul1 staining. (E) Cul1 expression was significantly increased from dysplastic nevi to primary (P < 0.001, χ2 test) and metastatic melanomas (P < 0.001, χ2 test). DN, dysplastic nevi; PM, primary melanoma; MM, metastatic melanoma; Bar = 10 μm. We also assessed the correlation between Cul1 expression and clinicopathological parameters of the patients and found that Cul1 expression did not correlate with age, gender, tumor thickness, ulceration, tumor subtype and sites. In addition, we constructed Kaplin–Meier survival curves using either overall or disease-specific 5-yr survival of primary, metastatic or all the melanoma patients and found that Cul1 expression did not correlate with melanoma patient survival (Figure S1). Previously, it was reported that Cul4A, another cullin protein, was commonly expressed in different cancers, and Cul4A protein expression was increased in breast and hepatocellular cancers (Chen et al., 1998; Yasui et al., 2002). In this study, we for the first time demonstrated overexpression of Cul1 in melanoma. However, it remains unclear why Cul1 is highly expressed in melanoma. The c-Myc oncoprotein plays an important role in the growth and proliferation of normal and neoplastic cells (Cole, 1986). O’hagan et al. (2000) have verified that Cul1 is a direct Myc-responsive gene target, and c-Myc promotes ubiquitin-dependent proteolysis by directly activating the expression of Cul1 gene. As an oncogenic transcription factor, c-Myc is frequently upregulated in human melanoma (Ross and Wilson, 1998) although its role in melanomagenesis has not been addressed. It is possible that upregulated c-Myc may contribute to overexpression of Cul1 in melanomas. Future studies should be conducted to elucidate the relationship between c-Myc and Cul1 expression in human melanoma progression. In summary, Cul1 overexpression is significantly correlated with melanoma development at early stages, implying targeting Cul1 may serve as a potential therapy for melanoma. This work is supported by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP-93810) and Canadian Dermatology Foundation (G.L.). G.C. is a recipient of Postdoctoral Trainee Award from Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research jointly funded with VGH & UBC Hospital Foundation. Y.C. is a recipient of the CIHR Skin Research Training Centre Trainee Award. Figure S1. Cul1 expression does not correlate with melanoma patient survival. Please note: Wiley-Blackwell are not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting materials supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing material) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePigment Cell & Melanoma ResearchSame topicUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysFrench-language works237,207