MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1606545327

National belongings : hybridity in Italian colonial and postcolonial cultures

2010· book-chapter· en· W1606545327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
DE Duncan, Jacqueline Andall

Bibliographic record

VenueExplore Bristol Research · 2010
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicItalian Fascism and Post-war Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHybridityTransculturationColonialismAmbivalenceMetisMimicryPower (physics)HistoryPostcolonialism (international relations)SociologyAnthropologyGender studiesEthnologyArt historyHumanitiesArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Contents: Jacqueline Andall/Derek Duncan: Introduction: Hybridity in Italian Colonial and Postcolonial Culture - Alessandro Triulzi: Displacing the Colonial Event: Hybrid Memories of Postcolonial Italy - Vetri Nathan: Mimic-nation, Mimic-men: Contextualizing Italy's Migration Culture through Bhabha - Maurizio Marinelli: Italy and/in Tianjin: Remaking the Urban Form and Rewriting History - Roberta Pergher: Between Colony and Nation on Italy's 'Fourth Shore' - Domenica Ghidei Biidu/Sabrina Marchetti: Eritrean Memories of the Postcolonial Period: Ambivalence and Mimicry in Italian Schools in Asmara - Jennifer Burns: Language and its Alternatives in Italophone Migrant Writing - Charles Burdett: Mussolini's Journey to Libya (1937): Ritual, Power and Transculturation - Jacqueline Andall: The G2 Network and Other Second-Generation Voices: Claiming Rights and Transforming Identities - Derek Duncan: Kledi Kadiu: Managing Postcolonial Celebrity - Rhiannon Noel Welch: Intimate Truth and (Post)colonial Knowledge in Shirin Ramzanali Fazel's Lontano da Mogadiscio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0080.018
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExplore Bristol ResearchSame topicItalian Fascism and Post-war SocietyFrench-language works237,207