MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1606783729 · doi:10.1002/9781118872086.ch8

Spatial Patterns of River Width in the Yukon River Basin

2014· other· en· W1606783729 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tamlin M. Pavelsky, George H. Allen, Zachary F. Miller

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical monograph · 2014
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsGeologyStructural basinDrainage basinHydrology (agriculture)OceanographyPhysical geographyClimatologyGeomorphologyGeographyCartography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter uses software designed to measure river widths from satellite imagery to measure the widths of all rivers in the Yukon River Basin wider than ˜100 m from water masks derived from Landsat imagery. It also uses this data set to (a) understand the distribution of widths in the basin and (b) obtain the first uniform, high-resolution downstream hydraulic geometry (DHG) estimates for the entire basin and, separately, its major tributaries. The first step in calculating river widths for the Yukon Basin is to develop a mask differentiating water from all other land cover types. In order to develop DHG relationships between width and discharge, it is necessary to match each width measurement with an estimate of river discharge. The chapter concludes that the width-discharge relationship for the Yukon Basin developed with >500,000 data points is consistent with previous studies of DHG using many fewer observations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score0.162

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical monographSame topicHydrology and Sediment Transport ProcessesFrench-language works237,207