MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1606822080 · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.171.9.4780

CpG-Containing Oligodeoxynucleotide 1826 Converts the Weak Uveitogenic Rat Interphotoreceptor Retinoid-Binding Protein Peptide 1181–1191 into a Strong Uveitogen

2003· article· en· W1606822080 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Shao, Sheher Sun, Jim Xiang, Henry J. Kaplan, Deming Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Immunology · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNational Eye Institute
KeywordsImmunogenAutoimmunityImmunologyCpG OligodeoxynucleotideUveitisAutoimmune diseaseBiologyMolecular biologyChemistryAntibodyMonoclonal antibodyBiochemistryGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aberrant activation of autoreactive T cells is one of the major causes of autoimmune disease. Autoantigens are sequestered and in many cases weak immunogens. For example, in experimental autoimmune uveitis, immunization of naive rats with autologous interphotoreceptor retinoid-binding protein (IRBP) fails to induce intraocular inflammation or a strong T cell response, whereas bovine IRBP is a strong inducer of experimental autoimmune uveitis. Such observations challenge the view that the autoantigen alone is responsible for the development of autoimmunity. Here, we demonstrate that autologous rat IRBP is converted to a strong immunogen in the presence of a small dose of CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides. Our results indicate that specific CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides may play an important role in the activation and expansion of autoreactive T cells in vivo, leading to autoimmune disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of ImmunologySame topicSystemic Lupus Erythematosus ResearchFrench-language works237,207