Commentaire de l'article « Esquisse d'une philosophie de l'histoire de la géographie économique » d'Henri Hauser
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RésuméCet article vise à discuter du rôle des entrepreneurs dans la création d’un quartier et d’une communauté ethniques. Pendant les quatre dernières décennies, les Portugais de Montréal ont développé une communauté complexe et prospère, démarrant des organisations, des entreprises et des services de communication et d’information dans leur langue. Qui sont les principaux acteurs qui se cachent derrière la fondation du quartier portugais ? D’une part, la question centrale est de savoir si les entrepreneurs sont des agents de changements social et économique, capables de créer des conditions pour la sociabilité et pour l’affirmation des valeurs culturelles portugaises à Montréal. D’autre part, de manière plus générale, nous cherchons à comprendre, à travers l’histoire de la création d’un quartier ethnique, comment s’exerce l’influence des entrepreneurs sur le changement social et économique.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".