MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The response of black spruce to the climatic influence of Robert-Bourassa Reservoir in northern Québec

2000· article· en· W1606973790 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Martin Tremblay, Yves Bégin

Bibliographic record

VenueEcoscience · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicTree-ring climate responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDendrochronologyTransectPhysical geographyBayEnvironmental scienceClimate changeHydrology (agriculture)Period (music)Growing seasonGeologyGeographyForestryEcologyOceanographyPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Do large hydroelectric reservoirs in northern Québec have an influence on regional climate? In the absence of any climatic record covering the period prior to and after damming, the influence of a reservoir was studied by means of tree rings. The objective of this research was to determine the reaction of black spruce to local climate change. The study was carried out on an island in the second-largest reservoir of the La Grande complex in the James Bay area, the Robert-Bourassa Reservoir (2835 km2), which is also the oldest (dammed in 1978 and completely flooded in September 1979). Trees (n = 14) about 100 years old were selected by means of two perpendicular transects on the island. Cross sections were cut at 1-m intervals at the base of trees, and at 10-cm intervals in the top section of the stem which developed during the last 30 years. Densitometric analysis was performed on each section. Results were compared with two reference chronologies using the same tree-ring parameters. Reference stands were selected outside the area of climatic influence of the reservoir. The identified tree-ring indicators of reservoir local climate were (i) absence of frost rings, despite their abundance outside the reservoir’s area of influence, due to a delayed growing season caused by local cool conditions; (ii) high frequency of light rings related to cooler summer conditions; (iii) large numbers of trees showing compression wood sequences indicating destabilization due to windier conditions associated with the increased fetch; (iv) lower annual wood production; (v) degradation of tree growth forms marked by massive foliage loss and branch mortality; and (vi) reduced wood density, despite increased proportion of latewood. The number of trees that showed these six tree-ring indicators was a function of distance to water and stand density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.968

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2000
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcoscienceSame topicTree-ring climate responsesFrench-language works237,207