MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607070242 · doi:10.1109/isemc.2004.1349968

Canadian specific absorption rate (SAR) and radiofrequency (RF) requirements: comprehensive revision of Radio Standards Specifications (RSS) 102

2004· article· en· W1607070242 on OpenAlexaffabout
T. Lacombe, H. Nappert, J.-C. Brien

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsInnovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRSSCertificationMandateRadio frequencyComputer scienceSoftware deploymentConformity assessmentTelecommunicationsWirelessWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radio Standards Specifications (RSS) 102 Issue 1 was published in 1999. RSS 102 Issue 1 outlines Industry Canada's evaluation procedures used by certification applicants to determine the compliance of mobile and portable radio transmitters with Canadian radiofrequency (RF) exposure limits. Since the publication of RSS 102 Issue 1, more versatile and easier to use radiocommunication devices that offer a host of new services have been deployed. With the introduction and deployment of new technologies comes the need for new regulatory requirements. Industry Canada is revising RSS 102 Issue 1 to cover new wireless applications, mandate the use of internationally recognized measurement techniques, add new RF exemption limits, and address RF compliance methods. In addition to a change in title, the document has been reformatted and updated to reflect Industry Canada's current publication format practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.118
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRFID technology advancementsFrench-language works237,207