MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Seasonal movements of Atlantic rock crab (Cancer irroratus Say) transplanted into a mussel aquaculture site

2011· article· en· W1607119739 on OpenAlexaffabout
Luc A. Comeau, Rémi Sonier, John Mark Hanson

Bibliographic record

VenueAquaculture Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyMusselEstuaryFisheryOverwinteringAquacultureTunicateEcologyFish <Actinopterygii>

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximately 73 000 Atlantic rock crab (Cancer irroratus) were captured in coastal waters and transferred to an estuarine mussel aquaculture site in Prince Edward Island, Canada, in an effort to control overgrowth by the invasive tunicate Ciona intestinalis. To assess whether transplanted crabs remained in the vicinity of mussel farms, acoustic tags were attached to 25 resident and 25 transplanted individuals (all males) and their movements were monitored for 1 year, from September 2006 to August 2007. Resident crabs tended to occupy (within 1.6 km) the middle estuary where the majority of mussel farms are located. They left this area during winter, possibly to reach upstream overwintering grounds, and most returned to the middle estuary in spring. In contrast, translocated crabs exhibited a marked downstream movement (<5.5 km distant) in autumn and winter and few returned into the middle estuary in spring. Results suggest that transplanting large numbers of additional rock crabs is not an effective means to reduce the effects of invasive tunicates on mussel farms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAquaculture ResearchSame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207