Le Musée des Beaux-Arts, entre la culture et le public : Barrière ou facteur de nivellement?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'art conçu comme capital culturel est au centre des recherches de sociologues tels que Pierre Bourdieu et ce concept est pertinent à l'analyse des musées d'art dans la société contemporaine. À la différence du niveau d'instruction, le goût artistique se conçoit comme une affaire individuelle sans grande importance sociale. Je critique cette position à la lumière de l'étude de Bourdieu et Darbel concernant les publics des musées d'art, je compare leurs résultats avec ceux des recherches actuelles en Europe et aux États-Unis, et je mets en doute les preuves de la relation entre le goût et la mobilité sociale. Le musée d'art peut devenir un facteur de nivellement plutôt qu'une barrière à l'égalité, mais tant qu'il subsiste des inégalités en matière d'éducation et de profession, ce programme a peu de chances de se réaliser.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.015 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".