MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W160713338 · doi:10.7202/001847ar

Le Musée des Beaux-Arts, entre la culture et le public : Barrière ou facteur de nivellement?

2002· article· fr· W160713338 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vera L. Zolberg

Bibliographic record

VenueSociologie et sociétés · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Industries and Urban Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'art conçu comme capital culturel est au centre des recherches de sociologues tels que Pierre Bourdieu et ce concept est pertinent à l'analyse des musées d'art dans la société contemporaine. À la différence du niveau d'instruction, le goût artistique se conçoit comme une affaire individuelle sans grande importance sociale. Je critique cette position à la lumière de l'étude de Bourdieu et Darbel concernant les publics des musées d'art, je compare leurs résultats avec ceux des recherches actuelles en Europe et aux États-Unis, et je mets en doute les preuves de la relation entre le goût et la mobilité sociale. Le musée d'art peut devenir un facteur de nivellement plutôt qu'une barrière à l'égalité, mais tant qu'il subsiste des inégalités en matière d'éducation et de profession, ce programme a peu de chances de se réaliser.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.691
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.401
GPT teacher head0.440
Teacher spread0.039 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociologie et sociétésSame topicCultural Industries and Urban DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207