MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607168430 · doi:10.1109/psec.2002.1022539

Protection of VSC-multi-terminal HVDC against DC faults

2003· article· en· W1607168430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInsulated-gate bipolar transistorElectrical engineeringBlocking (statistics)ConvertersCurrent injection techniqueFault (geology)Rectifier (neural networks)Voltage sourceGate turn-off thyristorBipolar junction transistorTerminal (telecommunication)EngineeringVoltageComputer scienceElectronic engineeringTransistorTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Voltage-source converters (VSCs), by themselves, are defenseless against DC faults. Their anti-parallel diodes conduct as rectifier bridges to feed the fault. Their IGBTs (insulated gate bipolar transistors) are helplessly by-passed, unable to extinguish the fault current. This paper shows how a VSC-multi-terminal high voltage direct current (MTDC) transmission system can survive DC faults by a using protection scheme based on: (1) fast, reliable fault detection; (2) blocking of IGBT-circuit breakers (IGBT-CBs) and blocking of the IGBTs of VSCs; (3) locating of the faulted DC line; (4) isolation of the faulted DC line by economical fast DC switches; and (5) de-blocking of IGBT-CBs and IGBTs of VSCs to resume normal service.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score0.402

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations161
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207