MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607229565

The Normal School for Women and Liberal Feminism in Mexico City, Late Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century

2012· article· en· W1607229565 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rosa María González Jiménez

Bibliographic record

VenueResources for feminist research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American and Latino Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFeminismGender studiesPoliticsFeminist movementSociologyPolitical scienceLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1904 first liberal feminist association is formed at Normal de Profesoras (Normal School for Women) in Mexico City. The article profiles first generation of feminists (writers, teachers, and atypical women), their demands and their social networks. Drawing from life story of Dolores Correa Zapata, influence she exerted upon next generation of feminists--who attended events such as Baltimore Feminist Congress (United States, 1922), The National Convention of Women (Mexico City, 1925), and International Feminist Congress--is identified. Feminism lies in raising to level of their species, human species. Dolores Correa Zapata (1906, p. 16) Feminist culture, so debated nowadays, ... must have Normal School for Women as its core Maria Arias Bernal (1916, p. 69) Introduction As twentieth century began to unfold, a group of advocating for feminism in Mexico City later came to be known as first wave of Mexican feminism (Lau, 1987). This paper attempts to analyze activities of these as agents of social change by identifying their demands, accomplishments and social networks. International research has documented that a feminist movement, linked to liberal, socialist and anarchist tendencies advocating women's right to vote and access upper education, erupted onto political scene in European cities late in nineteenth century (Anderson and Zinnsser ,1992). In Mexico, Macias (1982) conducted pioneering research on Mexican feminist movement from late nineteenth century to 1940s. He identified existence of a feminist association in Mexico City in 1904, namely Sociedad Protectora de la Mujer (Society for Protection of Women), though he failed to delve deeper into subject. Other research focusing on revolutionary period has singled out Hermila Galindo de Topete's request to Constituent Congress regarding women's suffrage, as well as First Feminist Congress, which took place in 1916 in Merida, as symbolic cornerstones of feminist movement (Cano, 1990, 1991; Lau and Ramos, 1993; Lau, 1995; Ramos, 1996). (1) In Mexican history, other have fought for their rights (if not openly using this particular terminology), even from far more radical standpoints than their predecessors. I offer two examples: Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz (1651-1695) was silenced by Catholic clergy, not for being a poet, as other nuns were, but for being erudite in her own right (Paz, 1983). Ignacia Riechy, a patriot who wished to organize a women's battalion to fight against French intervention, committed suicide in 1866 because of a liberal soldier's joke about her masculine appearance. However, their participation was individual rather than as part of a political movement. A political movement implies interaction, agreement, and social networking (2) between individuals who freely decide to stand for a social cause. Furthermore, if it indeed entails movement, it is bound to produce a reaction. The pioneering introduced in this paper gathered to discuss and bring about change in life of Mexican women. As part of feminist movement, they exposed subordination of by publicly advocating for particular demands. Methodology This research involves so-called cultural (Burke, 2003), and in particular history of women (Ramos, 1996; Scott, 2003). Making use of Lopez Austin's metaphor (1990), similar to a telephone company technician I investigated the order of wiring in social subsoil of writers of late nineteenth century. I designed a database of writers who were popular between 1880 and 1905, and I created another database concerning writers from magazines intended for a female audience: El Correo de las Senoras (CS) (1882-1883), El Album de la Mujer (EAM) (1883-1886), Violetas del Anahuac (VA) (1887-1889), and La Mujer Mexicana (LMM) (1904-1908). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.738
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResources for feminist researchSame topicLatin American and Latino StudiesFrench-language works237,207