MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607317954 · doi:10.1002/wrna.1186

<scp>miR</scp>‐122 Promotion of the hepatitis C virus life cycle: sound in the silence

2013· review· en· W1607317954 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueWiley Interdisciplinary Reviews - RNA · 2013
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicroRNA in disease regulation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersSaskatchewan Health Research FoundationUniversity of Saskatchewan
KeywordsGene silencingUntranslated regionBiologymicroRNAViral life cycleVirusHepatitis C virusVirologyRNAArgonauteRNA silencingRNA interferenceGeneGeneticsCell biologyViral replication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The unusual role for miR ‐122 in promoting the hepatitis C virus ( HCV ) life cycle was first identified in 2005, but its mechanism of action remains uncharacterized. The virus appears to use the microRNA ( miRNA ) in a way that is opposed to that of normal miRNAs . Instead of interacting with sequences in the 3′‐untranslated region ( UTR ), miR ‐122 binds to two sites in the 5′‐ UTR , and instead of silencing gene expression or promoting the degradation of the viral RNA , it stabilizes the genome and potently augments the efficiency by which HCV RNA accumulates in infected cells. This review discusses the current knowledge and models for the mechanism by which miR ‐122 promotes the HCV life cycle. Annealing of miR ‐122 to the HCV genome requires particular base pairing, stimulates translation, and stabilizes the viral genome by blocking degradation by host exonucleases, but these functions are unlikely to be the whole story. We will discuss other possible functions for miR ‐122, the stages of the HCV life cycle at which miR ‐122 may influence HCV , and other related viruses that may be similarly regulated by miR ‐122. Despite our lack of detailed mechanistic information, antagonism of miR ‐122 is emerging as a powerful method to inhibit HCV infections, and unique to other HCV treatment strategies does not, thus far, appear to induce emergence of escape mutants. Used alone or in combination with other antiviral drugs, miR ‐122 antagonists could be useful to both inhibit the virus and provide selective pressure to inhibit the development of resistance. WIREs RNA 2013, 4:665–676. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1186 This article is categorized under: RNA Turnover and Surveillance &gt; Regulation of RNA Stability Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches &gt; RNAi: Mechanisms of Action Regulatory RNAs/RNAi/Riboswitches &gt; Regulatory RNAs RNA in Disease and Development &gt; RNA in Disease

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it